ChatGTP has been taking the internet by storm with its impressive ability to spit out reasonable sounding text, but it is all that great? is it clippy back from the dead to take revenge on us all?
- It takes all character out of your sentences.
- It has a habit of dropping key details for a more generic sentence.
- The longer your inputs are the more likely it's spit out nonsense. Giving it small sections at a time to work on is better.
- Everything it produces need to be proofread.
- It really, really likes the work additionally for some reason.
ChatGTP has a very strange ability to "corporatize" just about just about anything and remove everything remotely human about a sentence.
Take this for example:
Me: reword and expand: chat gtp is able to produce quite good sentences but has all the contextual intelligence of a flat worm.
ChatGTP: While ChatGPT is capable of generating high-quality sentences through natural language processing, its contextual understanding is still limited compared to human intelligence. In other words, while ChatGPT can produce coherent and grammatically correct responses, it lacks the depth of understanding and nuance that humans possess. This is because ChatGPT relies on a vast database of pre-existing text to generate its responses, rather than having the ability to truly comprehend the meaning behind language like a human brain can. Therefore, while ChatGPT can provide helpful information and engage in conversation, it should be used as a tool to assist human intelligence, rather than a replacement for it.
If that paragraph doesn’t scream corporate press release maybe you need to take a day off from work and let your brain detox.
ChatGTP is a tool, that, while amazing a first glance has it's issues and bugs. It's certainly a step above clippy and has it's place helping to flesh out emails, memos and cover letters but it's formal and stiff. An article on New Yorker titled "ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web" was close, Chat GTP is actually a smudge tool for text.
Now let's see Chat GTP's take on this article:
Me: write a article regarding the pros and cons of chatgtp in this style: [...]
ChatGTP: ChatGTP has been making waves on the internet with its ability to produce coherent and grammatically correct sentences through natural language processing. However, is it really as impressive as it appears to be? This article will take a closer look at the pros and cons of ChatGTP.
One of the most significant drawbacks of ChatGTP is its tendency to remove all character from your sentences. It has a habit of dropping key details to produce more generic responses, which can result in it missing the point entirely. Additionally, the longer the input, the more likely it is to produce nonsense. Therefore, giving it smaller sections to work on is generally more effective.
Another major drawback of ChatGTP is that everything it produces needs to be proofread. While it can generate coherent and grammatically correct sentences, it can also produce awkward phrasing or sentences that don't quite make sense. This means that anything produced by ChatGTP should always be double-checked to ensure accuracy and clarity.
The biggest criticism of ChatGTP, however, is its tendency to "corporatize" just about anything and remove all human qualities from a sentence. It has a knack for producing sentences that sound like corporate press releases, which can make it difficult to engage in a natural conversation.
In conclusion, while ChatGTP is an impressive tool, it is not as impressive as it initially appears to be. It has some significant drawbacks, including removing character from sentences, producing generic responses, and its tendency to "corporatize" language. Therefore, it should be used as a tool to assist human intelligence, rather